2.7
The one-dimensional infinite square well
Quantum mechanics' "hydrogen atom before hydrogen": completely solvable, and almost every quantum feature already shows up.
Recommended first
After this section you should be able to
- Solve the infinite well from scratch, start to finish
- Explain why n = 0 is excluded and why the level spacing grows with n
- Expand an arbitrary initial state in eigenstates and write down its evolution
- Use the correspondence principle to show how the classical result returns at large n
A particle trapped between two infinitely high walls. It is the simplest bound-state problem there is, and it already contains energy quantisation, zero-point energy, node structure, orthogonality and completeness — the entire grammar of quantum mechanics makes its first appearance here.
Solving it
The full solution: from equation to energy levelsbasic~8 min
Step 1: fix the domain.
Outside the well . The stationary equation demands , and as the only finite solution is . The particle is absolutely never found outside the well.
Continuity of the wavefunction then gives the boundary conditions
(Note: is not required to be continuous here, because is infinite — see the table at the end of section 2.2.)
Step 2: solve inside the well.
Inside, :
(A bound state requires : if then with solutions , which cannot vanish at both ends.) The general solution is
Step 3: impose the boundary conditions.
immediately gives . That leaves
Taking gives the trivial everywhere-zero solution (unnormalisable, and no particle). So we must have
Why does start at 1? gives ; negative merely flips the overall sign of , which is the same physical state (a global phase). Only the positive integers count.
Step 4: the energy levels.
From and :
Step 5: normalisation.
(taking positive real; the phase is arbitrary). Finally
Reading the result
The picture
Standing waves in a box. The boundary conditions are exactly those of a string clamped at both ends, so the eigenstates are the string’s harmonics: the well must hold an integer number of half-wavelengths, .
Combine that with de Broglie’s and you get at once; then reproduces the energy formula above. Quantisation = the standing-wave condition.
Nodes. has zeros inside the well. Higher energy means sharper bending (curvature ) and more nodes. This “number of nodes = n − 1” rule holds generally for one-dimensional bound states.
The mathematics
Orthonormality:
(Verify directly with a product-to-sum identity: for both terms integrate over a whole number of periods and vanish.)
The infinite square well
Drag the width L and the quantum number n and watch the energy, the waveform and the probability distribution move together. Units: ħ = m = 1.
- Energy Eₙ (n=1)
- 4.935
- relative to E₁(L=1)
- 1.00 ×
- ⟨x⟩ / L
- 0.500
- Δx / L
- 0.180
Shrink the box and every level is pushed up together: E ∝ 1/L²
nodes = n − 1 = 0 (endpoints excluded)
Try this
- Drag
Lfrom 2.5 down to 0.6 and keep your eye on the dashed line in the level diagram (pinned at the reference energy E₁(L=1)): it sinks all the way to the bottom, meaning every level has risen far above it. The "relative to E₁(L=1)" readout climbs from 0.16 to 2.78 — "the tighter you confine a particle, the more kinetic energy it has", a direct consequence ofΔxΔp ≥ ħ/2. - Change
nin the stationary mode and note that|ψ|²never changes with time (the curve stands still); switch to a superposition, press play, and|ψ|²immediately starts sloshing. That is exactly what "stationary" refers to. - Leave only c₁ in the superposition (drag the rest to 0) and press play — the probability density stops moving again. However long a single eigenstate evolves, it only picks up an overall phase
e^(−iEₙt/ħ), which no observable can see. - Push n above 10 and look at
|ψ|²: the fringes get so fine that the distribution is nearly uniform — the classical picture of a particle equally likely to be anywhere in the box. The correspondence principle, in view.
Expanding an arbitrary initial state
Because is complete, any initial state satisfying the boundary conditions can be expanded:
Example: a particle initially uniform over the left halfadvanced~7 min
Take
(already normalised: ). The coefficients are
Term by term:
| 1 | 0 | 0.405 | |
| 2 | 0.405 | ||
| 3 | 0 | 0.045 | |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0.016 |
The first two terms already account for 81%. Check: (use ).
What does an energy measurement give? with probability 40.5%, with 40.5%, with 4.5%, and so on. Note : the overlap of with this initial state happens to vanish exactly.
Evolution. The and components carry almost half the weight each, so the probability density sloshes between the two halves at
Set in the simulation above and watch it happen.
The correspondence principle
The relative level spacing supports the same conclusion:
At large the relative gap between neighbouring levels goes to zero and the spectrum looks continuous — precisely the classical picture.
Key formulas
Eigenstates
Nodes = n − 1; n = 0 gives the trivial solution and is excluded
Energy levels
Spacing grows with n: E_{n+1}−E_n=(2n+1)E₁
Expansion coefficients
|cₙ|² is the probability of measuring Eₙ
Classical limit
At large n the quantum oscillation is averaged away by finite resolution
Self-check4 questions
- 1.
Why can the quantum number n of the infinite well not be 0?
- 2.
If the well width shrinks from L to L/2, the ground-state energy changes by a factor of:
- 3.
The initial state Ψ(x,0) is constant for 0 < x < L/2 and zero elsewhere. Which statements about measuring the energy are correct? (Select all that apply.)
Select all that apply
- 4.
An electron is confined to a one-dimensional box of length L = 1.0 nm. Find the ground-state energy in eV. (ħc = 197.3 eV·nm, mc² = 511000 eV)
eV5% relative tolerance
What comes next
Lower the walls from infinite to finite and three interesting things happen: the number of bound states becomes finite, the wavefunction leaks outside the well, and scattering states appear.
Section 15 of 106 · use ← → to turn the page