Skip to content

3.1

From wavefunction to state vector

ψ(x) is not the state itself — it is only the state's components in one particular basis. Once you see that, the rest of this chapter falls into place on its own.

Recommended first

After this section you should be able to

  • Explain why Ψ(x) and φ(k) are two sets of components of one and the same state
  • Develop the analogy between a function and an infinite-dimensional vector, and pin down exactly where it holds
  • Distinguish a state from a representation, and explain why the choice of representation is free

Chapter 2 ended with three questions left hanging: why do observables correspond to operators? What actually happens during a measurement? And what entitles cn2|c_n|^2 to be a probability?

Answering them requires switching to a new language. This section explains why the switch is unavoidable.

A clue we have already met

In section 2.10 we described one and the same free particle with two functions:

Ψ(x)andϕ(k)=12πΨ(x)eikxdx(3.1.1)\Psi(x)\quad\text{and}\quad \phi(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int\Psi(x)\ee^{-\ii kx}\dd x\tag{3.1.1}

The two carry exactly the same information: knowing either one lets you compute the other, and normalisation holds on both sides (Parseval’s theorem).

A finite-dimensional analogy

Step back first to a situation you already know well.

Now carry this picture over to quantum mechanics:

Ψ(x)components in the position basisϕ(k)components in the momentum basiscncomponents in the energy basis(3.1.4)\underbrace{\Psi(x)}_{\text{components in the position basis}} \qquad \underbrace{\phi(k)}_{\text{components in the momentum basis}} \qquad \underbrace{c_n}_{\text{components in the energy basis}}\tag{3.1.4}

Three sets of numbers, one state.

The energy basis: components become a list of numbers

The position and momentum bases are both continuous — the index runs over the whole real line. But bound-state problems come with a more convenient basis.

In section 2.7 we expanded an arbitrary initial state in eigenstates:

Ψ(x)=n=1cnψn(x),cn=ψn(x)Ψ(x)dx(3.1.8)\Psi(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}c_n\psi_n(x),\qquad c_n=\int\psi_n^*(x)\Psi(x)\,\dd x\tag{3.1.8}

Compare with the vector expansion v=ivie^i\vec v=\sum_i v_i\hat e_i, vi=e^ivv_i=\hat e_i\cdot\vec vthe form is identical.

So in the energy basis, the components of the same state are a list of numbers (c1,c2,c3,)(c_1,c_2,c_3,\dots).

What comes next

If we are going to speak the language of “vectors, bases, components, inner products” for the long haul, we need matching notation — ideally something much shorter to write than Φ(x)Ψ(x)dx\int\Phi^*(x)\Psi(x)\dd x.

The notation Dirac designed for the job is one of the most successful notational inventions in all of physics.

Section 20 of 106 · use to turn the page