ψ(x) is not the state itself — it is only the state's components in one particular basis. Once you see that, the rest of this chapter falls into place on its own.
✓Explain why Ψ(x) and φ(k) are two sets of components of one and the same state
✓Develop the analogy between a function and an infinite-dimensional vector, and pin down exactly where it holds
✓Distinguish a state from a representation, and explain why the choice of representation is free
Chapter 2 ended with three questions left hanging: why do observables correspond to operators? What actually happens during a measurement? And what entitles ∣cn∣2 to be a probability?
Answering them requires switching to a new language. This section explains why the switch is unavoidable.
A clue we have already met
In section 2.10 we described one and the same free particle with two functions:
Ψ(x)andϕ(k)=2π1∫Ψ(x)e−ikxdx(3.1.1)
The two carry exactly the same information: knowing either one lets you compute the other, and normalisation holds on both sides (Parseval’s theorem).
A finite-dimensional analogy
Step back first to a situation you already know well.
◑The picture
An arrow in three-dimensional space. In Cartesian coordinates it reads (3,4,0); rotate the axes by 53° about the z axis and the same arrow becomes (5,0,0).
The three numbers changed. The arrow did not. Neither did its length ∣v∣=5.
"(3,4,0)" is not the vector — it is the vector’s components in one particular basis. The vector itself is the geometric object.
∑The mathematics
v=i=1∑3vie^i,vi=e^i⋅v(3.1.2)
Switch to a basis {e^i′} and the components become vi′=e^i′⋅v, but
v=i∑vie^i=i∑vi′e^i′(3.1.3)
Same v, two sets of books.
Now carry this picture over to quantum mechanics:
components in the position basisΨ(x)components in the momentum basisϕ(k)components in the energy basiscn(3.1.4)
Three sets of numbers, one state.
The energy basis: components become a list of numbers
The position and momentum bases are both continuous — the index runs over the whole real line. But bound-state problems come with a more convenient basis.
In section 2.7 we expanded an arbitrary initial state in eigenstates:
Ψ(x)=n=1∑∞cnψn(x),cn=∫ψn∗(x)Ψ(x)dx(3.1.8)
Compare with the vector expansion v=∑ivie^i, vi=e^i⋅v — the form is identical.
So in the energy basis, the components of the same state are a list of numbers (c1,c2,c3,…).
◑The picture
Three sets of components, one state
Basis
Components
Index
Position {∣x⟩}
Ψ(x)
continuous
Momentum {∣p⟩}
ϕ(k)
continuous
Energy {∣n⟩}
cn
discrete
No set is more “real” than any other. Which one to pick depends only on which makes the current problem easiest: the energy basis for bound states, the momentum basis for free propagation, the position basis for plotting probability distributions.
∑The mathematics
Normalisation looks the same in all three sets of books
∫∣Ψ(x)∣2dx=∫∣ϕ(k)∣2dk=n∑∣cn∣2=1(3.1.9)
That is no coincidence: all three are one and the same sentence — the state vector has length 1 — written out in different bases.
A vector’s length does not depend on the coordinate system, so the three equations must hold together.
∎Key formulas
Components ↔ function values
vi⟷Ψ(x)
Read x as a continuous index
Sum ↔ integral
i∑⟷∫dx
Every integral in chapter 2 is an inner product
Inner product
u⋅v=i∑ui∗vi⟷∫Φ∗Ψdx
Normalisation = length 1
Three sets of components of one state
∫∣Ψ∣2dx=∫∣ϕ∣2dk=n∑∣cn∣2=1
Length is independent of the choice of basis
?Self-check3 questions
1.
The most accurate description of the relation between Ψ(x) and φ(k) is:
2.
When a function is viewed as an infinite-dimensional vector, which correspondences are correct? (Select all that apply.)
Select all that apply
3.
Why do we say the choice of representation is free?
What comes next
If we are going to speak the language of “vectors, bases, components, inner products” for the long haul, we need matching notation — ideally something much shorter to write than ∫Φ∗(x)Ψ(x)dx.
The notation Dirac designed for the job is one of the most successful notational inventions in all of physics.