2.3
The time-independent Schrödinger equation
Separating variables splits the time-dependent problem in two: an eigenvalue problem that fixes the levels, and a trivial phase factor that handles the evolution.
Recommended first
After this section you should be able to
- Derive the stationary equation by separation of variables
- Explain why energy eigenvalues must be real, and why solutions exist only for particular E
- Judge the qualitative shape of a wavefunction in a given potential from its curvature
The full Schrödinger equation is
a partial differential equation. The good news: when does not depend explicitly on time — which covers almost every textbook problem — separation of variables splits it into two ordinary differential equations, and one of them is completely trivial.
Separating the variables
From the time-dependent equation to the stationary onebasic~5 min
Try a separable solution
and substitute:
Divide both sides by :
The left side is a function of alone, the right side of alone, and and are independent variables. A quantity depending only on can equal one depending only on only if both equal the same constant. Call that separation constant — it will turn out to be the energy.
The time part:
(the integration constant is absorbed into ). This solution is completely universal and has nothing to do with the shape of the potential. All the physics lives in the spatial part.
The spatial part, which is the time-independent Schrödinger equation:
or, in operator form, .
So a separable solution always looks like
Why E must be real
Bound-state energy eigenvalues are realadvanced~4 min
Assume with normalisable . Take the complex conjugate (with real):
Multiply the first equation by and the second by , then subtract; the terms cancel:
The bracket on the left is again a total derivative, . Integrating over all space turns the left side into a boundary term, which vanishes because is normalisable:
Hence , so is real.
This is no accident. Its general form is “the eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are real”, redone in operator language in section 3.5 — in three lines. The long-winded integral proof here shows exactly that: change the language and the same fact becomes much simpler.
Reality of has an immediate consequence: , so the time factor has constant modulus. Therefore does not change with time — which is where the name “stationary state” comes from. The next section says more.
Reading a wavefunction from its curvature
You can see roughly what looks like without solving anything. Rewrite the stationary equation as
The picture
Classically allowed region (): has the opposite sign to , so the curve bends towards the axis — it oscillates. The larger (the larger the kinetic energy), the sharper the bending and the shorter the wavelength.
Classically forbidden region (): has the same sign as , so the curve bends away from the axis — exponential behaviour. Physically we keep only the decaying branch, or normalisation fails.
Turning point (): and the curve changes its concavity there.
The mathematics
Key formulas
Time-independent Schrödinger equation
An eigenvalue problem: only particular E admit normalisable solutions
Separable solution
The time factor is independent of the potential — always this phase
Curvature relation
Oscillatory for E>V, exponential for E<V; the whole qualitative picture
Self-check3 questions
- 1.
Does the time factor e^{−iEt/ħ} obtained by separation of variables depend on the potential V(x)?
- 2.
Why are bound-state energies discrete?
- 3.
At one point E − V(x) = 4 eV; at another E − V(x) = 1 eV. Which statement about the wavefunction is correct?
What comes next
Separation of variables produces only a family of particular solutions. The genuinely general solution is a superposition of them — and superpositions behave nothing like stationary states. The next section returns to the full time-dependent equation.
Section 11 of 106 · use ← → to turn the page