2.5
Stationary and non-stationary states
What is stationary is the probability distribution, not the particle. Get that straight and half the confusion in quantum mechanics disappears.
Recommended first
After this section you should be able to
- Say which quantities change with time in a stationary state and which do not
- Explain why a single eigenstate never "moves" while a superposition does
- Estimate the oscillation period of a superposition from the level spacing
stationary stateAn energy eigenstate. Time evolution contributes only a global phase e^{−iEt/ħ}, so every expectation value is constant in time — what is stationary is the probability distribution, not the particle.See 2.5 is one of the most misread terms in the subject. The word stationary invites the thought “at rest”. The particle is not at rest.
What does not change in a stationary state
For :
The probability density does not depend on time. More generally, for any observable with no explicit time dependence, the expectation value
is time-independent too — the phase factors appear in pairs, in and , and always cancel.
The picture
What changes: the wavefunction itself. The phase of rotates uniformly at angular frequency . For the hydrogen ground state that is about — extremely fast.
What does not: every observable. The probability density, , , — all constant.
So what is stationary is the result of observation, not the wavefunction, and certainly not the particle.
The mathematics
In a single stationary state the unobservability of the global phase is taken to an extreme: the phase spins constantly and nothing can detect it.
Non-stationary states: the cross term does the work
As soon as two or more coefficients are non-zero, the probability density moves. The previous section computed the general two-state result:
(taking real ; is the initial phase difference between and ).
The first two terms are the individual densities, and they do not move. All of the time dependence sits in the cross term, oscillating at the Bohr frequency
See for yourself
The simulation below has a stationary/superposition toggle. This is the one thing in this section you should confirm with your own hands:
The infinite square well
Drag the width L and the quantum number n and watch the energy, the waveform and the probability distribution move together. Units: ħ = m = 1.
- Energy Eₙ (n=1)
- 4.935
- relative to E₁(L=1)
- 1.00 ×
- ⟨x⟩ / L
- 0.500
- Δx / L
- 0.180
Shrink the box and every level is pushed up together: E ∝ 1/L²
nodes = n − 1 = 0 (endpoints excluded)
Try this
- Drag
Lfrom 2.5 down to 0.6 and keep your eye on the dashed line in the level diagram (pinned at the reference energy E₁(L=1)): it sinks all the way to the bottom, meaning every level has risen far above it. The "relative to E₁(L=1)" readout climbs from 0.16 to 2.78 — "the tighter you confine a particle, the more kinetic energy it has", a direct consequence ofΔxΔp ≥ ħ/2. - Change
nin the stationary mode and note that|ψ|²never changes with time (the curve stands still); switch to a superposition, press play, and|ψ|²immediately starts sloshing. That is exactly what "stationary" refers to. - Leave only c₁ in the superposition (drag the rest to 0) and press play — the probability density stops moving again. However long a single eigenstate evolves, it only picks up an overall phase
e^(−iEₙt/ħ), which no observable can see. - Push n above 10 and look at
|ψ|²: the fringes get so fine that the distribution is nearly uniform — the classical picture of a particle equally likely to be anywhere in the box. The correspondence principle, in view.
In stationary mode, change freely — the probability density (purple) is a curve that never moves, however long you wait. Switch to superposition with and press play: the purple curve starts sloshing. Finally drag to zero, leaving only , and the sloshing stops immediately.
Why atoms do not collapse
Classical electrodynamics makes a fatal prediction: an electron orbiting a nucleus is accelerating, must therefore radiate, and would lose all its energy and spiral into the nucleus in about seconds. Matter should not exist.
Stationary states are the answer.
The picture
For an electron in the ground state, the charge distribution does not change with time at all. A static charge distribution does not radiate — a point classical electrodynamics itself concedes.
The electron is not “going round the nucleus”. The ground state is even spherically symmetric, with probability current vanishing everywhere. The orbiting picture of the Bohr model is simply wrong.
And there is no lower level to fall to, so the ground state is absolutely stable.
The mathematics
The deeper reason for that stability is the uncertainty principle:
As the first term () diverges faster than the second (), so the total energy goes back up. The minimum sits at
The Bohr radius is the balance point between the cost of confinement and the Coulomb gain.
Key formulas
Stationary state
Every observable is time-independent
Density of a two-state superposition
All time dependence lives in the cross term
Characteristic evolution time
Bigger gap, faster motion; excellent for estimates
Self-check3 questions
- 1.
Which statements about a particle in a stationary state ψₙ are correct? (Select all that apply.)
Select all that apply
- 2.
An infinite well starts in an equal superposition of ψ₁ and ψ₃. Compared with an equal superposition of ψ₁ and ψ₂, the oscillation frequency of the probability density changes by a factor of:
- 3.
Classical electrodynamics predicts that an orbiting electron radiates and collapses. How does quantum mechanics avoid this?
What comes next
We have been talking about probability distributions without ever extracting numbers from them systematically. The next section defines expectation values and variances, and writes down the uncertainty principle rigorously for the first time.
Section 13 of 106 · use ← → to turn the page