1.3
The photoelectric effect and Einstein's light quanta
Four experimental facts, none of which the classical wave picture can explain. Einstein changed one sentence and all four fell at once.
Recommended first
After this section you should be able to
- List the four facts classical wave theory cannot explain, and say where each one gets stuck
- Use hν = W + E_k to account for the threshold frequency, the instant response and the role of intensity
- Explain why Millikan's experiment became the strongest evidence for the very idea he set out to refute
The previous section ended at a boundary line: Planck held that “one unit at a time” was a property of the oscillators in the cavity wall, while light travelling through space remained a continuous electromagnetic wave.
This section is about someone crossing that line.
Simple experiment, awkward results
The apparatus has three parts: a metal plate, a collector and an ammeter. Shine light on the plate; if electrons are knocked out and reach the collector, the ammeter reads.
By 1902 Lenard had the measurements nailed down. Four facts:
The picture
Fact 1: there is a threshold frequency. Each metal has a threshold . Below it, no matter how bright the light or how long you wait, not a single electron comes out.
Fact 2: intensity does not affect electron energy. Turn the light up and the number of electrons increases, but the maximum kinetic energy of each one does not budge.
Fact 3: kinetic energy depends only on frequency. Higher frequency gives higher maximum kinetic energy, and the relation is linear.
Fact 4: the response is instantaneous. The current appears essentially the moment the light arrives (later measured at under s), even for light almost too faint to detect.
The mathematics
What classical wave theory expects, point by point:
For fact 1: energy is carried by amplitude, not frequency. Bright enough light for long enough ought to accumulate enough energy. Does not match.
For fact 2: more intensity means stronger fields, stronger forces on the electron, so it should come out faster. Does not match.
For fact 3: classically the frequency only sets how fast the electron is shaken, not its energy ceiling. Does not match.
For fact 4: energy flows in continuously from the whole wavefront, so it takes time to accumulate. Does not match.
Estimate: how long classical theory says you must waitbasic~5 min
Putting a number on “accumulating energy” shows how fatal fact 4 is.
Take a faint beam with power density (roughly a candle a few metres away). An atom has a cross-section of about .
The power intercepted by one atom is then
Ejecting an electron requires overcoming the work function, typically . The time to accumulate that is
About a year.
The measured delay is under a nanosecond. Sixteen orders of magnitude apart — this is not a theory that lacks precision, it is a picture that is simply wrong.
Einstein changed one sentence
In 1905 the 26-year-old Einstein, working in a patent office, wrote a paper titled “On a heuristic point of view concerning the production and transformation of light”. He said:
That is the whole change. Now go through the four facts again:
is the work function, the minimum cost of pulling an electron out of the metal. is what the electron has left over.
- Threshold frequency: if , a single photon cannot pay for the ticket and no electron emerges. More photons do not help, because pooling is not allowed — an electron absorbs one at a time. Hence .
- What intensity does: intensity equals the number of photons. More photons knock out more electrons (larger current), but each still receives , so the energy ceiling is unchanged.
- Linear in frequency: , a straight line of slope exactly and intercept .
- Instant response: nothing needs accumulating. A photon arrives, hits an electron, and the transaction is done.
Millikan came to refute it and nailed it down instead
Einstein’s paper was not popular. Even Planck did not accept it — putting inside light in flight struck him as going too far.
Work it out: the threshold wavelength of sodiumbasic~4 min
Sodium has a work function . The corresponding threshold wavelength is
(Remember — one of the most useful constants there is.)
544 nm is green. So green, blue and violet light eject electrons from sodium; yellow and red never will, however long you shine them.
One more: with 400 nm violet light the maximum kinetic energy is
Stopping those electrons requires 0.82 V of reverse bias on the collector — and this stopping voltage is precisely what the experiment measures directly.
Key formulas
Photon energy
hc = 1240 eV·nm, the workhorse for photon-energy estimates
Einstein's photoelectric equation
One electron absorbs one photon — that sentence is the crucial one
Threshold frequency
Below it no intensity suffices
Stopping voltage
Plot U₀ against ν: slope h/e, intercept gives the work function
Self-check4 questions
- 1.
Which assumption actually forbids "bright enough low-frequency light will eject electrons"?
- 2.
Double the intensity of the incident light at fixed frequency. Which quantities change? (Select all that apply.)
Select all that apply
- 3.
What was Millikan trying to do with his precision photoelectric experiments, and what happened?
- 4.
Ultraviolet light of 250 nm strikes tungsten, work function W = 4.3 eV. What is the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons, in eV? (hc = 1240 eV·nm)
eV15% relative tolerance
What comes next
By now two of the three dead ends from section 1.1 have been undone by the same sentence: energy is exchanged in whole units.
The third remains: why atoms do not collapse, and why spectra are sets of sharp lines.
In 1913 a young Dane working under Rutherford in Manchester decided to try attaching “one unit at a time” directly to the electron’s orbit, and see what came out.
Section 4 of 106 · use ← → to turn the page