7.6
Fermi's golden rule
When the final states form a continuum, the oscillating transition probability becomes a constant transition rate — one formula that rules every calculation of emission, absorption and scattering.
Recommended first
After this section you should be able to
- Explain why a continuum of final states turns t² growth and oscillation into a constant rate
- Complete the derivation of the golden rule, making clear how sinc² becomes an energy-conserving δ function in the long-time limit
- Recast the pair of factors "energy conservation + how many places to go" in the language of the density of states
- Estimate the order of magnitude of the hydrogen 2p→1s spontaneous-emission lifetime (nanoseconds), and state the golden rule's window of validity in time
The last section left a crack. For a single final state, first-order theory gives a probability that either grows madly as (on resonance) or oscillates back and forth (off resonance). Yet excited atoms in the laboratory wear an entirely different face: a population of hydrogen atoms in the 2p state loses a fixed fraction every nanosecond, its number sliding smoothly down as with — no oscillation, no acceleration. “A fixed fraction per unit time” means there exists a constant transition rate . Where does this constant rate spring from?
The difference hides in the nature of the final states. Last section we tacitly assumed the transition’s destination was one discrete state; but when an atom emits light, the destination is “the atom drops to 1s plus a photon flies away” — and the photon can fly in any direction, carry either of two polarisations, and take any frequency within the resonance width. The final state is not a point; it is a continuum. When we measure “has the atom decayed yet?”, we do not care which way the photon went, so the probability must be summed over the whole continuum. It is this summation that flattens the oscillations into a rate.
Counting the final states: the density of states
To sum over a continuum, we first need to answer “how many states are there per unit energy interval near ?” That quantity is the density of states, written : there are states with energy between and . It is a pure counting problem, with no dynamics in it.
The most common example: a particle (or photon) placed in a large box of volume , with momentum quantised onto the lattice . Each state occupies a volume of -space; count the lattice points in a spherical shell of radius , convert to energy, and out comes . For photons (, two polarisations):
The box is only scaffolding: in any physical answer, always cancels against the normalisation factor in the matrix element, and the final rate is independent of the box size.
From sinc² to a rate
Deriving the golden rulebasic~10 min
Step 1: sum the single-state probability over the continuum of final states.
Take the cleanest case first: a perturbation switched on suddenly at and held constant thereafter (the periodic perturbation , after the rotating-wave approximation, is completely isomorphic — just replace and the detuning by ). The last section’s first-order amplitude integral gives (writing ):
The total transition probability is the sum over all final states; use the density of states to write it as an integral ():
Step 2: see what sinc² looks like at long times.
As a function of , has a main peak of height 1 and width about . The larger , the narrower the peak — and once it is narrower than any scale over which varies with energy, the factor is essentially constant across the peak and can be pulled out at its central value:
The remaining integral is the standard result , which after the change of variable equals .
Step 3: the miracle.
The peak width’s shaves one power off the : the total probability grows linearly in time. Linear growth is the very definition of “constant rate”, so
This is Fermi’s golden rule (it was actually Dirac who derived it; Fermi called it “golden rule number two” in his lecture notes, and the name stuck — yet another miscarriage of justice in the history of physics naming).
What happened, retold in pictures: the probability for each single final state oscillates, but final states at different detunings oscillate with different periods. In the sum, the states sitting exactly on the resonance shell grow steadily, while those slightly off rise and fall out of phase with one another — summing over the continuum averages the oscillations away, leaving only the net outflow through the resonance shell. Mathematically this is the limit
The sinc² peak sharpens into a δ function: in the long-time limit energy conservation is strictly enforced, which is why the golden rule is often written with an explicit δ function (after integrating over final states the two forms agree).
The picture
Rate = the channel’s “bandwidth” times the “traffic”. The golden rule splits the transition rate into two factors:
- — how tightly the perturbation ties the initial and final states together (how wide each lane is);
- — how many lanes there are on the energy-conserving shell.
However large the matrix element, with nowhere to go () the rate is zero: put an excited atom inside the band gap of a photonic crystal, where the photon states at the relevant frequency have been “emptied out”, and spontaneous emission really is suppressed — the density of states is not a bookkeeping device but a piece of physical reality you can engineer.
The mathematics
or, equivalently, with the final-state sum written out:
A constant rate yields exponential decay: , lifetime , natural linewidth (the energy–time uncertainty relation showing yet another face).
An order-of-magnitude calculation: why the atom lives 1.6 nanoseconds
The golden rule’s most famous client: spontaneous emission. A hydrogen atom falls from 2p back to 1s, releasing a 10.2 eV photon. The matrix element comes from the electric-dipole interaction (, dipole moment of order ); the density of states is the photon formula above. Feed both into the golden rule, sum over photon directions and polarisations, and the rate tidies up to
( is the fine-structure constant.) The arithmetic: , taking the matrix-element factor as 1 for now:
The exact matrix element squeezes in a further factor of 0.55, giving , i.e.
in exact agreement with experiment. Take a moment to feel what this number means: the light wave’s period is , so the atom oscillates through four million periods before emitting one photon — the coupling of atom to light field (powers of ) is genuinely feeble, which in turn explains why first-order perturbation theory is so trustworthy here.
Push the same rule outward and you get the whole of spectroscopy and scattering physics: photoabsorption cross-sections, beta-decay rates (Fermi’s own use for it), electron–phonon scattering in solids, the resistance of metals — for any problem where “an initial state flows through a weak coupling into a continuum of final states”, step one is always to write down the golden rule.
Key formulas
Golden rule
Rate = coupling strength × number of final states on the energy shell
δ-function limit
Energy conservation strictly enforced in the long-time limit
Photon density of states
The box volume V eventually cancels against the matrix element’s 1/V
Exponential decay
Hydrogen 2p→1s: Γ=6.3×10⁸ s⁻¹, τ≈1.6 ns
Self-check4 questions
- 1.
The transition probability to a single final state oscillates. Why does summing over a continuum of final states produce a constant rate?
- 2.
Put an excited atom inside the band gap of a photonic crystal (where the photon density of states at the relevant frequency is zero). What happens?
- 3.
Which statements about the golden rule’s window of validity in time are correct? (Select all that apply.)
Select all that apply
- 4.
The spontaneous-emission rate of hydrogen 2p→1s is Γ = 6.3×10⁸ s⁻¹. Find the lifetime τ of the 2p state, in ns.
ns10% relative tolerance
What comes next
Time-dependent perturbation theory handles disturbances that are “fast but weak”: the light field oscillates millions of periods before triggering a single transition. Now twist the dial to the opposite end — what if the disturbance is extremely slow? Compress the well gradually, rotate the magnetic field gently: will the system jump away, or follow along obediently? The answer (the adiabatic theorem) is useful in its own right, but in 1984 Berry discovered a character in the story that had been overlooked for half a century: a system carried slowly around a closed loop comes back with a phase imprinted on its wavefunction that depends only on the geometry of the path. This “geometric phase” went on to thread together the Aharonov–Bohm effect and the entire field of topological matter.
Section 55 of 106 · use ← → to turn the page